Middle income vs Pakistan: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Middle income
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 153.8% against 49.3% in Middle income, a difference of 104.5%.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 3.1 times Middle income's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Middle income ranks 26th and Pakistan ranks 27th of 45 groups.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle income | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.9% | 11.6% | 7.7% | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 16.6% | 45.7% | 29.1% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 35.5% | 93.8% | 58.3% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 44.9% | 139.9% | 95.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Middle income or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 153.8% against 49.3% in Middle income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Middle income and Pakistan?
- 104.5%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Middle income and Pakistan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Middle income ranks 26th and Pakistan ranks 27th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.