Namibia vs Turkmenistan: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Namibia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 100.9% against 97.6% in Turkmenistan, a difference of 3.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Namibia ranks 50th and Turkmenistan ranks 53rd of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3% | -10.8% | 10.5% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 23.5% | 68.6% | 45.1% | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 40.4% | 94.1% | 53.7% | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 70.9% | 97.4% | 26.4% | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Namibia or Turkmenistan?
- Namibia, at 100.9% against 97.6% in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 3.3%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Turkmenistan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Namibia ranks 50th and Turkmenistan ranks 53rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.