Small states vs Uzbekistan: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Small states
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 137.3% against 32.4% in Small states, a difference of 104.9%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 4.2 times Small states's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Small states ahead.
Small states ranks 33rd and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 45 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Small states | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.8% | 9.2% | 6.4% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 22.8% | 55.1% | 32.3% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 30.5% | 101.7% | 71.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 28.6% | 132.5% | 103.9% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Small states or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 137.3% against 32.4% in Small states as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Small states and Uzbekistan?
- 104.9%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Small states and Uzbekistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Small states and Uzbekistan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Small states ranks 33rd and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.