Brazil vs Montenegro: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Brazil
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 91.84 kg/ha against 87.4 kg/ha in Brazil, a difference of 4.44 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Brazil ranks 33rd and Montenegro ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.25 kg/ha | 100.71 kg/ha | 61.46 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 56.63 kg/ha | 91.62 kg/ha | 35 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 86.26 kg/ha | 88.98 kg/ha | 2.71 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Brazil or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 91.84 kg/ha against 87.4 kg/ha in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Brazil and Montenegro?
- 4.44 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Montenegro rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Brazil ranks 33rd and Montenegro ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).