Chad vs Ethiopia PDR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Chad
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Chad currently reports 3.17 kg/ha against 2.66 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.51 kg/ha.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 161st and Ethiopia PDR ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia PDR in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1338 kg/ha | 0.0732 kg/ha | 0.0606 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.8319 kg/ha | 0.573 kg/ha | 0.2589 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.67 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | 0.7928 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 0.9581 kg/ha | 2.9 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Chad or Ethiopia PDR?
- Chad, at 3.17 kg/ha against 2.66 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Chad and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.51 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chad and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Chad ranks 161st and Ethiopia PDR ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).