Cuba vs Uganda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Uganda
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.78 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.5 kg/ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 169th and Uganda ranks 171st of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 55.84 kg/ha | 0.376 kg/ha | 55.46 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 55.24 kg/ha | 0.4106 kg/ha | 54.83 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 84.32 kg/ha | 0.066 kg/ha | 84.26 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 35.26 kg/ha | 0.119 kg/ha | 35.14 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 11.41 kg/ha | 0.5811 kg/ha | 10.83 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 15.79 kg/ha | 0.8769 kg/ha | 14.92 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 5.69 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | 4.68 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cuba or Uganda?
- Cuba, at 1.78 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cuba and Uganda?
- 0.5 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Uganda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 169th and Uganda ranks 171st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).