Eritrea vs Sierra Leone: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.87 kg/ha against 1.42 kg/ha in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.45 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Eritrea ranks 169th and Sierra Leone ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.26 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | 6.06 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.73 kg/ha | 0.6132 kg/ha | 2.11 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2.42 kg/ha | 0.8084 kg/ha | 1.61 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 3.46 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | 2.04 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eritrea or Sierra Leone?
- Eritrea, at 1.87 kg/ha against 1.42 kg/ha in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 0.45 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Sierra Leone rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and Sierra Leone ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).