Estonia vs Philippines: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Philippines
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 61.11 kg/ha against 60.5 kg/ha in Philippines, a difference of 0.61 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Philippines ahead.
Estonia ranks 62nd and Philippines ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.79 kg/ha | 44.49 kg/ha | 21.7 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 37.41 kg/ha | 49.5 kg/ha | 12.09 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2010s | 58.59 kg/ha | 53.86 kg/ha | 4.73 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 66.8 kg/ha | 61.54 kg/ha | 5.26 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Philippines?
- Estonia, at 61.11 kg/ha against 60.5 kg/ha in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Philippines?
- 0.61 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Philippines rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 62nd and Philippines ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).