Estonia vs Singapore: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 62.12 kg/ha against 61.11 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 1.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Singapore ahead.
Estonia ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.79 kg/ha | 2,179 kg/ha | 2,156 kg/ha | Singapore |
| 2000s | 37.41 kg/ha | 293.5 kg/ha | 256.09 kg/ha | Singapore |
| 2010s | 58.59 kg/ha | 65.46 kg/ha | 6.86 kg/ha | Singapore |
| 2020s | 66.8 kg/ha | 66.67 kg/ha | 0.1299 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 62.12 kg/ha against 61.11 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Singapore?
- 1.01 kg/ha, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Singapore?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Singapore rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 61st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).