Eswatini vs USSR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- USSR
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 37.21 kg/ha against 33.98 kg/ha in USSR, a difference of 3.23 kg/ha.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times USSR's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 100th and USSR ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and USSR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.83 kg/ha | 9.61 kg/ha | 9.23 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 27.61 kg/ha | 28.21 kg/ha | 0.6001 kg/ha | USSR |
| 1980s | 41.55 kg/ha | 44.03 kg/ha | 2.49 kg/ha | USSR |
| 1990s | 35.1 kg/ha | 36.07 kg/ha | 0.9704 kg/ha | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eswatini or USSR?
- Eswatini, at 37.21 kg/ha against 33.98 kg/ha in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eswatini and USSR?
- 3.23 kg/ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Eswatini and USSR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 100th and USSR ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).