Finland vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Finland
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Finland currently reports 40.52 kg/ha against 37.77 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 2.75 kg/ha.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 96th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 99th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.95 kg/ha | 22.6 kg/ha | 7.65 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 27.02 kg/ha | 45.61 kg/ha | 18.59 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 34.05 kg/ha | 63.36 kg/ha | 29.32 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 30.94 kg/ha | 47.43 kg/ha | 16.49 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Finland or Yugoslav SFR?
- Finland, at 40.52 kg/ha against 37.77 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Finland and Yugoslav SFR?
- 2.75 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Finland and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Finland ranks 96th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 99th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).