Haiti vs Kiribati: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Kiribati
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.2644 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.2644 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 176th and Kiribati ranks 180th of 186 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1057 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.1057 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1970s | 0.8865 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.8865 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1980s | 1.55 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 1.55 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1990s | 3.95 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 3.95 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2000s | 3.27 kg/ha | 0.2647 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2010s | 4.67 kg/ha | 0.1882 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 0.5428 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.5428 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Haiti or Kiribati?
- Haiti, at 0.2644 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Haiti and Kiribati?
- 0.2644 kg/ha, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Kiribati rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 176th and Kiribati ranks 180th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).