Japan vs Zambia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Japan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 56.73 kg/ha against 56.02 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.71 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 76th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 99.14 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 96.85 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 103.16 kg/ha | 11.55 kg/ha | 91.62 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 99.04 kg/ha | 20.12 kg/ha | 78.93 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 85.78 kg/ha | 12.29 kg/ha | 73.49 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 77.89 kg/ha | 10.47 kg/ha | 67.42 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 68.77 kg/ha | 35.87 kg/ha | 32.9 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 61.93 kg/ha | 48.25 kg/ha | 13.68 kg/ha | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Japan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 56.73 kg/ha against 56.02 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Japan and Zambia?
- 0.71 kg/ha, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Zambia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Japan ranks 76th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).