Kiribati vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.1779 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.1779 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 178th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1838 kg/ha | 0.0186 kg/ha | 0.1652 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0.1008 kg/ha | 0.1008 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kiribati or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.1779 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kiribati and South Sudan?
- 0.1779 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 178th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).