Kyrgyzstan vs Paraguay: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 24.07 kg/ha against 22.84 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.23 kg/ha.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 120th and Paraguay ranks 118th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.23 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | 12.54 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 12.79 kg/ha | 12.41 kg/ha | 0.3881 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 21.66 kg/ha | 24.19 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 24.82 kg/ha | 24.61 kg/ha | 0.2031 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 24.07 kg/ha against 22.84 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Paraguay?
- 1.23 kg/ha, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Paraguay rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 120th and Paraguay ranks 118th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).