Latvia vs Saudi Arabia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 54.07 kg/ha against 52.76 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 1.31 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Latvia ranks 80th and Saudi Arabia ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.18 kg/ha | 54.41 kg/ha | 33.23 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 33.46 kg/ha | 55.27 kg/ha | 21.81 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 52.47 kg/ha | 49.57 kg/ha | 2.9 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 60.9 kg/ha | 55.16 kg/ha | 5.74 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 54.07 kg/ha against 52.76 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Saudi Arabia?
- 1.31 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 80th and Saudi Arabia ranks 79th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).