Malawi vs Spain: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Spain
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 48.52 kg/ha against 47.72 kg/ha in Spain, a difference of 0.8 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Malawi ranks 89th and Spain ranks 90th of 185 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.98 kg/ha | 21.35 kg/ha | 19.36 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 6.13 kg/ha | 36.46 kg/ha | 30.33 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 11.23 kg/ha | 47.34 kg/ha | 36.1 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 14.22 kg/ha | 53.7 kg/ha | 39.48 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 19.6 kg/ha | 55.71 kg/ha | 36.12 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 22.21 kg/ha | 58.11 kg/ha | 35.9 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 31.61 kg/ha | 52.59 kg/ha | 20.97 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malawi or Spain?
- Malawi, at 48.52 kg/ha against 47.72 kg/ha in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malawi and Spain?
- 0.8 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Spain rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 89th and Spain ranks 90th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).