Antigua and Barbuda vs Dominica: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Dominica
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Dominica, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 180th and Dominica ranks 180th of 186 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10 t | 1,600 t | 1,590 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 10 t | 1,490 t | 1,480 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 10 t | 1,067 t | 1,057 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 10 t | 1,541 t | 1,531 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 12.3 t | 425.7 t | 413.4 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 20.2 t | 155.7 t | 135.5 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 5.75 t | 60 t | 54.25 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Antigua and Barbuda or Dominica?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 t against 0 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Antigua and Barbuda and Dominica?
- 0 t, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Dominica rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 180th and Dominica ranks 180th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).