Armenia vs Chad: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 16,921 t against 15,116 t in Armenia, a difference of 1,805 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 131st and Chad ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,467 t | 5,569 t | 3,898 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 14,433 t | 6,868 t | 7,565 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 35,626 t | 11,503 t | 24,122 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 17,900 t | 15,840 t | 2,060 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Chad?
- Chad, at 16,921 t against 15,116 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Chad?
- 1,805 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chad?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Chad rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 131st and Chad ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).