Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen

Australia
1.84 million t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
4.02 million t
in 2023
Australia rank
12th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
9th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Australia
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 4.02 million t against 1.84 million t in Australia, a difference of 2.18 million t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 2.2 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th of 185 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 76,421 t 132,563 t 56,142 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 159,994 t 410,099 t 250,105 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 294,615 t 837,954 t 543,339 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 624,132 t 1.32 million t 697,508 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 836,419 t 1.67 million t 828,603 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 1.16 million t 2.71 million t 1.55 million t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 1.69 million t 3.68 million t 1.98 million t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Australia or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 4.02 million t against 1.84 million t in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
2.18 million t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
Australia ranks 12th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-nitrogen/australia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-nitrogen/australia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).