Austria vs Zimbabwe: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Austria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 96,045 t against 92,522 t in Austria, a difference of 3,523 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77,424 t | 32,516 t | 44,908 t | Austria |
| 1970s | 123,470 t | 62,764 t | 60,706 t | Austria |
| 1980s | 133,782 t | 84,519 t | 49,262 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 113,920 t | 87,981 t | 25,939 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 95,514 t | 51,734 t | 43,780 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 100,777 t | 63,043 t | 37,733 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 92,703 t | 104,725 t | 12,022 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Austria or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 96,045 t against 92,522 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Austria and Zimbabwe?
- 3,523 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Zimbabwe rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Austria ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).