Belize vs Lebanon: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 13,852 t against 12,435 t in Belize, a difference of 1,417 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Belize ranks 121st and Lebanon ranks 119th of 185 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 421.11 t | 10,913 t | 10,492 t | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 666.2 t | 20,751 t | 20,085 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 1,111 t | 14,400 t | 13,289 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 1,503 t | 17,997 t | 16,494 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 5,726 t | 19,709 t | 13,983 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 9,885 t | 20,491 t | 10,605 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 11,193 t | 11,364 t | 171.38 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 13,852 t against 12,435 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Lebanon?
- 1,417 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Lebanon rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 121st and Lebanon ranks 119th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).