Belize vs Madagascar: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Madagascar
How they compare
Belize currently reports 12,435 t against 12,076 t in Madagascar, a difference of 359 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Belize ranks 134th and Madagascar ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 421.11 t | 2,540 t | 2,119 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 666.2 t | 4,768 t | 4,102 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 1,111 t | 4,512 t | 3,401 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 1,503 t | 5,219 t | 3,715 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 5,726 t | 4,493 t | 1,232 t | Belize |
| 2010s | 9,885 t | 13,215 t | 3,330 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 11,193 t | 13,121 t | 1,928 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Madagascar?
- Belize, at 12,435 t against 12,076 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Madagascar?
- 359 t, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Madagascar rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 134th and Madagascar ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).