Botswana vs Slovenia: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Botswana
- Slovenia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 17,547 t against 16,894 t in Slovenia, a difference of 653 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Botswana ranks 113th and Slovenia ranks 116th of 185 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,234 t | 22,184 t | 19,950 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 8,389 t | 24,615 t | 16,226 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 13,874 t | 15,460 t | 1,586 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 15,044 t | 16,708 t | 1,665 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen, Botswana or Slovenia?
- Botswana, at 17,547 t against 16,894 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen between Botswana and Slovenia?
- 653 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Slovenia rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen?
- Botswana ranks 113th and Slovenia ranks 116th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).