Cabo Verde vs Grenada: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 137 t against 133 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 4 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 180th and Grenada ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28 t | 258 t | 230 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 53.8 t | 258 t | 204.2 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 67.71 t | 258 t | 190.29 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 109.64 t | 258 t | 148.36 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | 110.7 t | 159 t | 48.3 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | 117.4 t | 155.4 t | 38 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | 147 t | 157.5 t | 10.5 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 137 t against 133 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Grenada?
- 4 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Grenada rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 180th and Grenada ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).