Canada vs Russian Federation: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Canada
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Canada currently reports 2.83 million t against 2.59 million t in Russian Federation, a difference of 238,810 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Canada ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.39 million t | 1.29 million t | 107,100 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 1.53 million t | 1.03 million t | 496,517 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 2.25 million t | 1.58 million t | 669,022 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 2.64 million t | 2.59 million t | 56,275 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Canada or Russian Federation?
- Canada, at 2.83 million t against 2.59 million t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Canada and Russian Federation?
- 238,810 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Russian Federation rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Canada ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).