Caribbean vs Mali: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Caribbean
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 80,660 t against 76,271 t in Caribbean, a difference of 4,389 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 82nd and Mali ranks 80th of 201 groups.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 150,203 t | 423.11 t | 149,780 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 234,988 t | 4,336 t | 230,651 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 364,439 t | 8,575 t | 355,864 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 224,780 t | 13,850 t | 210,930 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 118,392 t | 45,178 t | 73,213 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 142,052 t | 97,721 t | 44,331 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 112,984 t | 83,149 t | 29,834 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Caribbean or Mali?
- Mali, at 80,660 t against 76,271 t in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Caribbean and Mali?
- 4,389 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Mali rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Caribbean ranks 82nd and Mali ranks 80th of 201 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).