China, Hong Kong SAR vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- South Sudan
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 546 t against 458 t in South Sudan, a difference of 88 t.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 155th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 186 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 878.88 t | 47.25 t | 831.62 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 556.5 t | 254 t | 302.5 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, China, Hong Kong SAR or South Sudan?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 546 t against 458 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan?
- 88 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 155th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).