Congo vs Eritrea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,471 t against 1,292 t in Eritrea, a difference of 179 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 162nd and Eritrea ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,557 t | 3,198 t | 1,641 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,003 t | 1,586 t | 583.3 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 461.4 t | 1,672 t | 1,210 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2,354 t | 2,394 t | 39.5 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Congo or Eritrea?
- Congo, at 1,471 t against 1,292 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Congo and Eritrea?
- 179 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Congo ranks 162nd and Eritrea ranks 164th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).