Congo vs Mauritania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Congo
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 1,918 t against 1,471 t in Congo, a difference of 447 t.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 162nd and Mauritania ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 821.89 t | 174 t | 647.89 t | Congo |
| 1970s | 1,336 t | 765.4 t | 570.7 t | Congo |
| 1980s | 573.7 t | 953 t | 379.3 t | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 1,394 t | 3,686 t | 2,292 t | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 1,003 t | 1,642 t | 639.3 t | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 461.4 t | 2,473 t | 2,012 t | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 2,354 t | 2,634 t | 279 t | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Congo or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 1,918 t against 1,471 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Congo and Mauritania?
- 447 t, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Congo ranks 162nd and Mauritania ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).