Czechia vs Japan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Japan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 264,000 t against 240,720 t in Japan, a difference of 23,280 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Japan ahead.
Czechia ranks 39th and Japan ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 229,856 t | 419,463 t | 189,607 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 260,208 t | 366,994 t | 106,787 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 344,532 t | 309,480 t | 35,051 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 289,162 t | 268,590 t | 20,572 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Japan?
- Czechia, at 264,000 t against 240,720 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Japan?
- 23,280 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Japan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Japan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 39th and Japan ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).