Czechoslovakia vs Hungary: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Hungary
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 280,000 t against 242,596 t in Hungary, a difference of 37,404 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 38th and Hungary ranks 41st of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 252,444 t | 198,548 t | 53,896 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 526,745 t | 503,096 t | 23,649 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 649,500 t | 598,221 t | 51,279 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 385,367 t | 257,035 t | 128,331 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Hungary?
- Czechoslovakia, at 280,000 t against 242,596 t in Hungary as of 1992.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Hungary?
- 37,404 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Hungary?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Hungary rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 38th and Hungary ranks 41st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).