Djibouti vs Singapore: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Djibouti
- Singapore
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 52 t against 41 t in Singapore, a difference of 11 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Djibouti ranks 172nd and Singapore ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 500 t | 1,000 t | 500 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 531.2 t | 1,080 t | 548.8 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 72.04 t | 2,190 t | 2,118 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 53.5 t | 2,612 t | 2,558 t | Singapore |
| 2000s | 12.76 t | 333.8 t | 321.04 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 30.3 t | 44.7 t | 14.4 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 56.25 t | 44 t | 12.25 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Djibouti or Singapore?
- Djibouti, at 52 t against 41 t in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Djibouti and Singapore?
- 11 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Singapore rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Djibouti ranks 172nd and Singapore ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).