Ecuador vs Greece: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 163,621 t against 150,814 t in Ecuador, a difference of 12,807 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Ecuador ranks 63rd and Greece ranks 60th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Greece in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13,330 t | 133,026 t | 119,696 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 30,243 t | 264,484 t | 234,242 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 37,848 t | 401,579 t | 363,731 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 59,206 t | 344,790 t | 285,584 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 125,187 t | 230,900 t | 105,713 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 186,210 t | 183,715 t | 2,496 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 190,643 t | 173,557 t | 17,086 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Greece?
- Greece, at 163,621 t against 150,814 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Greece?
- 12,807 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Greece?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Greece rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 63rd and Greece ranks 60th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).