Ecuador vs Slovakia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Slovakia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 150,814 t against 115,392 t in Slovakia, a difference of 35,422 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 60th and Slovakia ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66,643 t | 71,983 t | 5,340 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 125,187 t | 86,418 t | 38,769 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 186,210 t | 120,756 t | 65,454 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 190,643 t | 133,763 t | 56,880 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Slovakia?
- Ecuador, at 150,814 t against 115,392 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Slovakia?
- 35,422 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Slovakia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 60th and Slovakia ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).