Egypt vs Poland: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Egypt
- Poland
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1.24 million t against 842,047 t in Poland, a difference of 401,153 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.5 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Egypt ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 248,883 t | 368,847 t | 119,964 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 400,664 t | 890,292 t | 489,627 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 676,701 t | 1.07 million t | 395,687 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 872,183 t | 640,988 t | 231,195 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 1.19 million t | 779,272 t | 413,779 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 1.21 million t | 870,372 t | 337,203 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 1.31 million t | 798,702 t | 507,223 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Egypt or Poland?
- Egypt, at 1.24 million t against 842,047 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Egypt and Poland?
- 401,153 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Poland rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Egypt ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).