El Salvador vs Estonia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Estonia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 46,092 t against 43,697 t in Estonia, a difference of 2,395 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 92nd and Estonia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54,980 t | 22,015 t | 32,965 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 48,128 t | 22,988 t | 25,140 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 54,560 t | 39,190 t | 15,370 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 48,409 t | 47,240 t | 1,169 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Estonia?
- El Salvador, at 46,092 t against 43,697 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Estonia?
- 2,395 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Estonia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 92nd and Estonia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).