Equatorial Guinea vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 458 t against 317 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 141 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 159th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 236 t | 47.25 t | 188.75 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 296.75 t | 254 t | 42.75 t | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Equatorial Guinea or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 458 t against 317 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 141 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 159th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).