Eritrea vs Montenegro: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1,317 t against 1,292 t in Eritrea, a difference of 25 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Eritrea ranks 151st and Montenegro ranks 150th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 451.75 t | 1,384 t | 932 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 1,672 t | 1,291 t | 380.2 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2,394 t | 1,279 t | 1,115 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 1,317 t against 1,292 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Montenegro?
- 25 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Montenegro rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 151st and Montenegro ranks 150th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).