Eswatini vs Yemen: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Yemen
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 7,256 t against 6,655 t in Yemen, a difference of 601 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 129th and Yemen ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Yemen in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,729 t | 76 t | 2,653 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 4,673 t | 3,484 t | 1,188 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 6,888 t | 13,980 t | 7,092 t | Yemen |
| 1990s | 3,659 t | 13,256 t | 9,596 t | Yemen |
| 2000s | 4,446 t | 13,399 t | 8,952 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 5,707 t | 15,423 t | 9,716 t | Yemen |
| 2020s | 7,566 t | 5,736 t | 1,830 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Yemen?
- Eswatini, at 7,256 t against 6,655 t in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Yemen?
- 601 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Yemen rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 129th and Yemen ranks 131st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).