Faroe Islands vs Guadeloupe: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Faroe Islands
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 7 t against 0 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 7 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 178th and Guadeloupe ranks 180th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 2 and Guadeloupe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 307 t | 1,967 t | 1,660 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 307 t | 3,206 t | 2,898 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 307 t | 3,122 t | 2,815 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 307 t | 2,939 t | 2,632 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 288.1 t | 1,454 t | 1,166 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 388 t | 0 t | 388 t | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 7 t | 0 t | 7 t | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Faroe Islands or Guadeloupe?
- Faroe Islands, at 7 t against 0 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Faroe Islands and Guadeloupe?
- 7 t, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Guadeloupe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Faroe Islands and Guadeloupe rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Faroe Islands ranks 178th and Guadeloupe ranks 180th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).