Finland vs Zimbabwe: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Finland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 96,045 t against 91,130 t in Finland, a difference of 4,915 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40,313 t | 32,516 t | 7,797 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 66,502 t | 62,764 t | 3,738 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 78,196 t | 84,519 t | 6,323 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 76,859 t | 87,981 t | 11,122 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 109,474 t | 51,734 t | 57,739 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 101,415 t | 63,043 t | 38,372 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 89,289 t | 104,725 t | 15,436 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Finland or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 96,045 t against 91,130 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 4,915 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Finland ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).