Gambia vs Mauritius: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Gambia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 5,494 t against 4,496 t in Mauritius, a difference of 998 t.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Gambia ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 137th of 186 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31 t | 9,608 t | 9,577 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 489.6 t | 10,195 t | 9,706 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1,159 t | 10,699 t | 9,541 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 524.9 t | 11,841 t | 11,316 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,237 t | 11,390 t | 10,153 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 793.1 t | 9,183 t | 8,390 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1,617 t | 5,761 t | 4,144 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Gambia or Mauritius?
- Gambia, at 5,494 t against 4,496 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Gambia and Mauritius?
- 998 t, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Gambia and Mauritius rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Gambia ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 137th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).