Georgia vs Switzerland: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 36,300 t against 33,071 t in Switzerland, a difference of 3,229 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 95th and Switzerland ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,450 t | 42,788 t | 6,338 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 26,362 t | 34,920 t | 8,558 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 21,176 t | 32,559 t | 11,383 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 37,238 t | 33,307 t | 3,930 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Switzerland?
- Georgia, at 36,300 t against 33,071 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Switzerland?
- 3,229 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Switzerland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Switzerland rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 95th and Switzerland ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).