Guatemala vs Kenya: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Kenya
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 171,200 t against 166,060 t in Kenya, a difference of 5,140 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 54th and Kenya ranks 56th of 185 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13,545 t | 9,886 t | 3,660 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 38,191 t | 21,628 t | 16,562 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 61,460 t | 39,850 t | 21,610 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 106,562 t | 49,700 t | 56,862 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 110,923 t | 74,126 t | 36,797 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 173,325 t | 127,125 t | 46,200 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 188,073 t | 161,586 t | 26,487 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Kenya?
- Guatemala, at 171,200 t against 166,060 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Kenya?
- 5,140 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Kenya rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 54th and Kenya ranks 56th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).