Honduras vs Nepal: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Honduras
- Nepal
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 105,364 t against 98,996 t in Nepal, a difference of 6,368 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 66th and Nepal ranks 67th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,277 t | 1,335 t | 6,943 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 12,640 t | 9,638 t | 3,002 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 16,983 t | 30,916 t | 13,933 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 50,546 t | 66,165 t | 15,619 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 62,395 t | 21,835 t | 40,560 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 82,604 t | 88,323 t | 5,720 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 113,722 t | 107,757 t | 5,965 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Honduras or Nepal?
- Honduras, at 105,364 t against 98,996 t in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Honduras and Nepal?
- 6,368 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Nepal rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Honduras ranks 66th and Nepal ranks 67th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).