Honduras vs Slovakia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Honduras
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 115,392 t against 105,364 t in Honduras, a difference of 10,028 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Honduras ranks 66th and Slovakia ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64,776 t | 71,983 t | 7,207 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 62,395 t | 86,418 t | 24,023 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 82,604 t | 120,756 t | 38,152 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 113,722 t | 133,763 t | 20,041 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Honduras or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 115,392 t against 105,364 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Honduras and Slovakia?
- 10,028 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Slovakia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Honduras ranks 66th and Slovakia ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).