Ireland vs Tunisia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ireland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 64,534 t against 57,142 t in Tunisia, a difference of 7,392 t.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,112 t | 6,629 t | 3,483 t | Ireland |
| 1970s | 37,758 t | 20,882 t | 16,876 t | Ireland |
| 1980s | 75,133 t | 41,016 t | 34,117 t | Ireland |
| 1990s | 91,929 t | 51,333 t | 40,595 t | Ireland |
| 2000s | 80,073 t | 67,370 t | 12,703 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 79,977 t | 79,752 t | 224.74 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 80,935 t | 73,087 t | 7,848 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Ireland or Tunisia?
- Ireland, at 64,534 t against 57,142 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Ireland and Tunisia?
- 7,392 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Tunisia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Ireland ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).