Jordan vs Rwanda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jordan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 23,247 t against 20,358 t in Rwanda, a difference of 2,889 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 118th and Rwanda ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,266 t | 54.22 t | 1,212 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 2,471 t | 110.3 t | 2,361 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 8,162 t | 548.4 t | 7,614 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 9,254 t | 363.8 t | 8,890 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 8,340 t | 1,037 t | 7,303 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 14,795 t | 5,572 t | 9,223 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 17,665 t | 17,006 t | 659 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or Rwanda?
- Jordan, at 23,247 t against 20,358 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and Rwanda?
- 2,889 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Rwanda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Jordan ranks 118th and Rwanda ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).