Kazakhstan vs Latvia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 72,277 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1,877 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61,225 t | 28,474 t | 32,751 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 34,990 t | 36,396 t | 1,406 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 73,180 t | 65,554 t | 7,626 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 74,300 t | 82,936 t | 8,636 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 72,277 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Latvia?
- 1,877 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Latvia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).